Background: In July of 2003, Department of Industrial
Relations (DIR) determined that a habitat restoration contractor,
under contract to the state, was in violation of prevailing wage
laws because they did not pay the volunteers prevailing wages.
This determination is a result of SB 975 (Alarcon), effective
January 2002, which redefined “public works,” and
SB 278 (Machado), effective January 2003, which required publicly-funded
“public works” projects to pay prevailing wages to
workers. DIR informed DFG’s contractors that most current
contracts under the Fisheries Restoration Grant Program (and one
would assume other such restoration programs throughout the state)
are in violation of the prevailing wage laws. Issues of volunteerism,
liability, proper prevailing wage rates have not been adequately
resolved. Legislation is required immediately. AB 2690 (Hancock)
is the vehicle currently being used but only addresses volunteer
issues.
BILL NUMBER: SB 975 CHAPTERED BILL TEXT
CHAPTER 938
FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE OCTOBER 14, 2001
APPROVED BY GOVERNOR OCTOBER 14, 2001
PASSED THE SENATE SEPTEMBER 6, 2001
PASSED THE ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY AUGUST 30, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 18, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 12, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 10, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 25, 2001
INTRODUCED BY Senator Alarcon
FEBRUARY 23, 2001
An act to amend Section 63036 of the Government Code, and to
amend Section 1720 of the Labor Code, relating to the California
infrastructure and economic development bank.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 975, Alarcon. California Infrastructure and Economic Development
Bank.
Existing law, the Bergeson-Peace Infrastructure and Economic
Development Bank Act, establishes the California Infrastructure
and Economic Development Bank in the Trade and Commerce Agency.
The act requires public works financed by the bank to comply with
certain laws applicable to payment of prevailing wages on public
works.
This bill would require any of those public works financed through
the use of industrial development bonds under the California Industrial
Development Financing Act to comply with those laws relating to
payment of prevailing wages.
Existing law generally defines "public works" to include
construction, alteration, demolition, or repair work done under
contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds.
This bill would redefine "public works" to include
installation and provide that "paid for in whole or in part
with public funds" means certain payments, transfers, credits,
reductions, waivers, and performances of work, but does not include
the construction or
rehabilitation of affordable housing units for low- or moderate-income
persons, as specified.
This bill would provide that certain private residential housing
projects and development projects built on private property are
not subject to the prevailing wage, hour, and discrimination laws
that govern employment on public works projects.
This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 63036 of the Government Code is amended to
read:
63036. It is the intent of the Legislature that the activities
of the bank be fully coordinated with any future legislative plan
involving growth management strategies designed to protect California's
land resource, and ensure its preservation and use it in ways
which are economically and socially desirable. Further, all public
works financed pursuant to this division, including those projects
financed through the use of industrial development bonds under
Title 10 (commencing with Section 91500), shall comply with Chapter
1 (commencing with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the
Labor Code.
SEC. 2. Section 1720 of the Labor Code is amended to read:
1720. (a) As used in this chapter, "public works" means:
(1) Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair
work done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out
of public funds, except work done directly by any public utility
company pursuant to order of the Public Utilities Commission or
other public authority. For purposes of this paragraph, "construction"
includes work performed during the design and preconstruction
phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection
and land surveying work.
(2) Work done for irrigation, utility, reclamation, and improvement
districts, and other districts of this type. "Public work"
shall not include the operation of the irrigation or drainage
system of any irrigation or reclamation district, except as used
in Section 1778 relating to retaining wages.
(3) Street, sewer, or other improvement work done under the direction
and supervision or by the authority of any officer or public body
of the state, or of any political subdivision or district thereof,
whether the political subdivision or district operates under a
freeholder's charter or not.
(4) The laying of carpet done under a building lease-maintenance
contract and paid for out of public funds.
(5) The laying of carpet in a public building done under contract
and paid for in whole or part out of public funds.
(6) Public transportation demonstration projects authorized pursuant
to Section 143 of the Streets and Highways Code.
(b) For purposes of this section, "paid for in whole or in
part out of public funds" means the payment of money or the
equivalent of money by a state or political subdivision directly
to or on behalf of the public works contractor, subcontractor,
or developer,
performance of construction work by the state or political subdivision
in execution of the project, transfer of an asset of value for
less than fair market price; fees, costs, rents, insurance or
bond premiums, loans, interest rates, or other obligations that
would normally be required in the execution of the contract, which
are paid, reduced, charged at less than fair market value, waived
or forgiven; money to be repaid on a contingent basis; or credits
applied against repayment obligations.
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b):
(1) Private residential projects built on private property are
not subject to the requirements of this chapter if the projects
are not built pursuant to an agreement with a state agency, redevelopment
agency, or local public housing authority.
(2) (A) If the state or a political subdivision requires a private
developer to perform construction, alteration, demolition, installation,
or repair work on a public work of improvement as a condition
of regulatory approval of an otherwise private development
project, and the state or political subdivision contributes no
more money, or the equivalent of money, to the overall project
than is required to perform this public improvement work, and
the state or political subdivision maintains no proprietary interest
in the overall project, then only the public improvement work
shall thereby become subject to this chapter.
(B) If the state or a political subdivision reimburses a private
developer for costs that would normally be borne by the public,
or provides directly or indirectly a public subsidy to a private
development project that is de minimis in the context of the project,
an otherwise private development project shall not thereby become
subject to the requirements of this chapter.
(3) The construction or rehabilitation of affordable housing units
for low- or moderate-income persons pursuant to paragraph (5)
or (7) of subdivision (e) of Section 33334.2 of the Health and
Safety Code that are paid for solely with moneys from a Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund established pursuant to Section 33334.3
of the Health
and Safety Code or that are paid for by a combination of private
funds and funds available pursuant to Section 33334.2 or 33334.3
of the Health and Safety Code does not constitute a project that
is paid for in whole or in part out of public funds.
(4) "Paid for in whole or in part out of public funds"
shall not include tax credits provided pursuant to Section 17053.49
or 23649 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of this section to the contrary,
the following projects shall not, solely by reason of this section,
be subject to the requirements of this chapter:
(1) Qualified residential rental projects, as defined by Section
142 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code, financed in whole or in
part through the issuance of bonds that receive allocation of
a portion of the state ceiling pursuant to Chapter 11.8 of Division
1 (commencing with Section 8369.80) of the Government Code on
or before December
31, 2003.
(2) Single-family residential projects financed in whole or in
part through the issuance of qualified mortgage revenue bonds
or qualified veterans' mortgage bonds, as defined by Section 143
of the Internal Revenue Code, or with mortgage credit certificates
under a
Qualified Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, as defined by Section
25 of the Internal Revenue Code, that receive allocation of a
portion of the state ceiling pursuant to Chapter 11.8 of Division
1 (commencing with Section 8869.80) of the Government Code on
or before December 31, 2003.
(3) Low-income housing projects that are allocated federal or
state low-income housing tax credits pursuant to Section 42 of
the Internal Revenue Code, Chapter 3.6 of Division 31 (commencing
with Section 50199.4) of the Health and Safety Code, or Sections
12206, 17058, or 23610.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, on
or before
December 31, 2003.
(e) If a statute, other than this section, or an ordinance or
regulation, other than an ordinance or regulation adopted pursuant
to this section, applies this chapter to a project, the exclusions
set forth in subdivision (d) shall not apply to that project.
(f) For purposes of this section, references to the Internal Revenue
Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
and shall include the corresponding predecessor sections of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended.
BILL NUMBER: SB 278 CHAPTERED
BILL TEXT
CHAPTER 892
FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE SEPTEMBER 26, 2002
APPROVED BY GOVERNOR SEPTEMBER 25, 2002
PASSED THE SENATE AUGUST 30, 2002
PASSED THE ASSEMBLY AUGUST 26, 2002
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY AUGUST 15, 2002
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 26, 2001
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 14, 2001
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 17, 2001
AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 28, 2001
INTRODUCED BY Senator Machado
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Hertzberg)
FEBRUARY 16, 2001
An act to add Section 1771.8 to the Labor Code, relating to
public works.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 278, Machado. Public works project: Water Security, Clean Drinking
Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002.
Existing law, with certain exceptions, requires the payment of
not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for
work of a similar character in the locality in which a public
works project is performed to all workers employed on that public
works project.
Existing law provides that the body awarding any contract for
certain public works projects is prohibited from requiring the
payment of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages if the
awarding body elects to adopt and enforce a prescribed labor compliance
program relating to the payment of general prevailing rate wages
and related laws.
The Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection
Act of 2002, if approved by the voters at the November 5, 2002,
statewide general election, would authorize, for the purposes
of financing a safe drinking water, water quality, and water reliability
program, the issuance of bonds in the amount of $3,440,000,000.
This bill would require the body awarding any contract for a public
works project financed with funds made available by the Water
Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act
of 2002, if that initiative measure is approved by the voters,
to adopt and enforce that above-mentioned labor compliance program
for application to that public works project.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) Payment of the prevailing rate of per diem wages to workers
employed on public works projects is necessary to attract the
most skilled workers for those projects and to ensure that work
of the highest quality is performed on those projects.
(2) Public works projects should never undermine the wage base
in a community, and requiring that workers on public works projects
are paid the prevailing rate of per diem wages ensures that wage
base is not lowered.
(3) It is a matter of statewide concern that every public agency
in California pay the prevailing rate of per diem wages to workers
employed on public works projects undertaken by those public agencies.
(b) Therefore, it is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting
Section 2 of this act, that every public agency in California
pay the prevailing rate of per diem wages to workers employed
on public works projects undertaken by that public agency.
SEC. 2. Section 1771.8 is added to the Labor Code, to read:
1771.8. (a) The body awarding any contract for a public works
project financed in any part with funds made available by the
Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection
Act of 2002 (Division 26.5 (commencing with Section 79500) of
the Water Code) shall adopt and enforce, or contract with a third
party to adopt and enforce, a labor compliance program pursuant
to subdivision
(b) of Section 1771.5 for application to that public works project.
(b) This section shall become operative only if the Water Security,
Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002
(Division 26.5 (commencing with Section 79500) of the Water Code)
is approved by the voters at the November 5, 2002, statewide general
election.
AB 2690 (Hancock): Introduced, February 2004. The most current
version of this bill appears to address the volunteer issue, and
repeals Section 1720.4 of the Labor Code. It also applies retroactively
to January 1, 2002. This bill does not address the prevailing
wage issue including the past liabilities for non-volunteer labor.
Fish and Game Code 1501.5. (a) The department may enter into
contracts for fish and wildlife habitat preservation, restoration,
and enhancement with public and private entities whenever the
department finds that the contracts will assist in meeting the
department's duty to preserve, protect, and restore fish and wildlife.
(b) The department may grant funds for fish and wildlife habitat
preservation, restoration, and enhancement to public agencies,
Indian tribes, and nonprofit entities whenever the department
finds that the grants will assist it in meeting its duty to preserve,
protect, and restore fish and wildlife.
(c) Contracts authorized under this section are contracts for
services and are governed by Article 4 (commencing with Section
10335) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract
Code. No work under this section is public work or a public improvement,
and is not subject to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720)
of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code.
(d) This section does not apply to contracts for any of the following:
(1) Construction of office, storage, garage, or maintenance buildings.
(2) Drilling wells and installation of pumping equipment.
(3) Construction of permanent hatchery facilities, including raceways,
water systems, and bird exclosures.
(4) Construction of permanent surfaced roadways and bridges.
(5) Any project requiring engineered design or certification by
a registered engineer.
(6) Any contract, except contracts with public agencies, nonprofit
organizations, or Indian tribes that exceed fifty thousand dollars
($50,000) in cost, excluding the cost for gravel, for fish and
wildlife habitat preservation, restoration, and enhancement for
any
one of the following:
(A) Fish screens, weirs, and ladders.
(B) Drainage or other watershed improvements.
(C) Gravel and rock removal or placement.
(D) Irrigation and water distribution systems.
(E) Earthwork and grading.
(F) Fencing.
(G) Planting trees or other habitat vegetation.
(H) Construction of temporary storage buildings.
Labor Code 1771.5. (a) Notwithstanding Section 1771, an awarding
body may not require the payment of the general prevailing rate
of per diem wages or the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work for any public works project of
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) or less when the project
is for construction work, or for any public works project of fifteen
thousand dollars ($15,000)
or less when the project is for alteration, demolition, repair,
or maintenance work, if the awarding body elects to initiate and
enforce a labor compliance program pursuant to subdivision (b)
for every public works project under the authority of the awarding
body.
(b) For the purposes of this section, a labor compliance program
shall include, but not be limited to, the following requirements:
(1) All bid invitations and public works contracts shall contain
appropriate language concerning the requirements of this chapter.
(2) A prejob conference shall be conducted with the contractor
and subcontractors to discuss federal and state labor law requirements
applicable to the contract.
(3) Project contractors and subcontractors shall maintain and
furnish, at a designated time, a certified copy of each weekly
payroll containing a statement of compliance signed under penalty
of perjury.
(4) The awarding body shall review, and, if appropriate, audit
payroll records to verify compliance with this chapter.
(5) The awarding body shall withhold contract payments when payroll
records are delinquent or inadequate.
(6) The awarding body shall withhold contract payments equal to
the amount of underpayment and applicable penalties when, after
investigation, it is established that underpayment has occurred.
(c) For purposes of this chapter, "labor compliance program"
means a labor compliance program that is approved, as specified
in state regulations, by the Director of the Department of Industrial
Relations.
(d) For purposes of this chapter, the Director of the Department
of Industrial Relations may revoke the approval of a labor compliance
program in the manner specified in state regulations.
Issues to address:
· Where do prevailing wage laws apply?
· What exemptions exist?
· Is there liability for: the state, contractors and/or
landowners (including in-kind and cash cost shares that may not
meet prevailing wage requirements)?
· Are the issues of “volunteerism” and “amnesty”
being adequately addressed?
· How will this impact the DFG Fisheries Restoration Grant
Program, as well as other state programs?
· What parties are currently “negotiating”
the issues?
· What mechanisms exist to rectify outstanding issues/problems?
· What forums exist to allow for inclusion of all stakeholders?